Customers / Illustrative scenarios

Engineering scenarios, honestly labeled.

We have no customer deployments to report yet, so there are no case studies here. The entries below are illustrative architecture patterns for automated pull request reviews — useful shapes, not proof.

Eval domains
11
Score pillars
4 · 0.75 bar
Location tolerance
±2 lines
Leaderboard scores
Not published

Platform figures describe the evaluation harness, not customer deployments. See the methodology

01Illustrative scenarios

Patterns, not proof.

Each entry records a context and an outcome shape. Every one is an illustration — no customer, no deployment, no measured result.

  1. 01

    High-Throughput Payment Gateways

    Fintech & payment processors

    Go · TypeScript · PostgreSQL · Kafka

    Senior review time redirected from manual taint checking to core product architecture.

    High-throughput financial systems require automated verification of untrusted inputs across database boundaries. ScanDrix executes deterministic AST queries and source-to-sink dataflow tracking with fast turnaround, without manual checking of every sensitive route.

    Illustrative scenario

  2. 02

    Cloud-Native Infrastructure

    Regulated infrastructure & banking

    Go · Kubernetes · AWS GovCloud · gRPC

    Unified automated review baselines with compliance evidence generated natively from CI runs.

    Standardized review policies across multi-repository organizations prevent configuration drift and insecure patterns. Continuous AST and semantic checks generate structured audit trails directly from pull request reviews, aligning with SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria.

    Review baseline
    Declarative Drixy rules
    Compliance readiness
    Audit trails from CI

    Illustrative scenario

  3. 03

    Distributed Engineering Teams

    High-throughput microservices

    Python · Go · RabbitMQ · Redis

    Non-blocking automated code reviews for asynchronous engineering teams across time zones.

    Line-level review comments with actionable diff suggestions allow pull request authors to immediately apply corrections and merge without waiting on multi-day cross-timezone review cycles.

    Illustrative scenario

02Our testing, plainly

Where our testing numbers come from.

These describe the evaluation harness, not customer telemetry. The harness scores findings against ground truth automatically — and publishes no leaderboard.

We do not present a modelled saving as a result. The ROI calculator applies a stated 65% review-time assumption. That is an estimate to test against your own numbers, not a measurement, and it is labelled that way there.

Engine eval gate
11 domainsAnchoring, dedup, severity, format, investigation, rules, parser, summary, promotion, scorer, secondary — each with behavioral checks.
Composite score
4 pillars · 0.75 barRecall, precision, format and anchor location weighted into one number per run. Below the bar, the gate blocks.
Ground-truth tolerance
±2 linesRule violations score against ground-truth file + line sites: recall, precision, F1.
Public scores
Not publishedNo leaderboard and no competitor numbers until independent runs exist. Methodology first.

Engine evals: 11 domains behind a fail-closed gate. No public leaderboard. Read the full evaluation

03Design principles

What the system is built to do.

These are statements about the architecture, from the teams that build it — not customer testimonials. We have none yet, and we won't invent any.

ScanDrix combines tree-sitter AST queries with large language model reasoning, ensuring that every code review suggestion is backed by concrete structural proof rather than speculative hallucinations.
Deterministic AST ArchitectureStatic Analysis Engine, ScanDrix Core
By enforcing version-controlled Drixy rules across every repository, engineering teams establish uniform security baselines and generate verifiable audit trails automatically on every pull request.
Policy & Compliance FrameworkGovernance Protocol, ScanDrix Enterprise

When real customers agree to be named, their words will appear here with verified attribution. Until then, this section stays as architecture statements. If you run ScanDrix and want to be first, tell us.

Next step

Run it on your own pull requests.

Connect a repository and read the first review before believing any claim on this site. Or start with the evaluation behind our claims.