Compare architectures.
We compare against the three tools teams actually ask us about — architecture to architecture, not scoreboard to scoreboard.
How we compare
Three axes only.
Vendor comparisons usually cherry-pick one flattering metric. These three decide whether a review tool survives contact with a real engineering team.
Detection accuracy
Share of seeded vulnerabilities flagged at the correct file and line — not flagged somewhere in the repo.
Review speed
Median wall-clock time from pull request event to posted review, measured under concurrent load.
False positives
Share of flags a senior engineer judged incorrect, established by manual audit of every finding.
Want the testing methodology behind our own claims? See how we evaluate ourselves.
Judge it on your own code.
Architecture is comparable from public facts; accuracy is not — that you can only judge on your repositories. So run it and decide.