ARCHITECTURAL COMPARISON
ScanDrix vs GitHub Copilot
Compare whole-codebase AST security analysis against basic code completion inference.
| Capability | ScanDrix | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| Full PR Context Comprehension | Analyzes whole PR diff, call graphs & AST dependencies | Isolated token chunk window without full dependency tree |
| Deterministic Architecture Rules | Custom Drixy rules with Dry Run testing & CI gating | No custom deterministic AST rules |
| Multi-Git Provider Support | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure Repos, Forgejo | Strictly GitHub only |
| Taint Flow & Injection Scanning | Source-to-sink taint tracking across files | No dedicated taint analysis for PR review |
| Zero Code Training Guarantee | Zero data retention & no model training under contract | Subject to Microsoft/GitHub training terms |
Architectural comparison from public product information — not measured runs, no scores. Something stale? Tell us via the contact page.